i was bored so..:)

The previous post has been removed due to Mr. Slavins complaints.
Mr.Slavin himself dared to justify his claim by a non-existent section in the US constitution.
My client (me) refuses to remove any other existing blog entries.

Good morning ladies and gentlemen of the jury, i present to you today a case of pure misunderstanding. On the night of may 8th 2005, the following conversation occurred between my client and Mr. Slavin

[11:53:24] maximus1590: take off anything about me on your blog
[11:53:51] slipnotgirl2: why?
[11:55:25] maximus1590: its blasphemy and you have no right to write things like that...refering to me as gay

although these harsh words were spoken I will prove to you today that my client is undoubtedly innocent of all the charges stated against her, and has full rights to post whatever she wants .

First, let us consider the facts, The first amendment of the bill of rights guarantees my client freedom of speech, and freedom of the press (exhibit A below), yet my client, has removed one of the posts simply from the kindness of her heart. She refuses to remove any more, since these posts are exceptionally funny, and as I have already stated are protected by the first amendment.
Second, lets take into account Mr. Slavins own testimony (B). Ladies and gentlemen! May I ask how dare this man accuse an innocent young girl of blasphemy and rudeness when he himself admits to the actions that she has so vividly described? It is true that some colorful details were used, but we can all agree that they added to the overall humor of the situation. This is by no means blasphemy or false implications. It was not my clients intent to hurt or offend anyone, but rather to bring a smile to the readers face.
Finally, Mr. Slavin was clearly displacing his anger on my client (C). His anger was shown through his vulgar language, by which he had placed my client into the position of a victim of verbal abuse. Mr. Slavin, has never before revealed to my client that he was angry about the posts therefore putting her into an uncomfortable situation once again.

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, Mr. Slavin has falsely accused, threatened, and frightened my client, and still dares to ask her for more! Considering all of the above circumstances my client is clearly innocent of the charges stated against her, and I ask you to so find. Thank you.


Exhibit A (Amendment I of the US Bill of Rights)

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.


Exhibit B (Mr.Slavins comment)

At 9:25 PM, Max said…

I must make this clear! I did not slap nikita on the ass, but rather somewhere around his ribs. The humping is true...i did in fact start moving my ass back and forth in front of nikita's face, after i slapped him a few times. I was not trying to prove anything by this humping activity...what i was trying to do is prevent nikita from starting to touch me as he sometimes did. I am hopeful that the nikita will never touch me like he used to ever again. Oh yeah, i am not gay in any way


Exhibit C (further conversation)

[12:01:46] maximus1590: fuck that!
[12:25:53] maximus1590: i am about to block you
[12:26:34] maximus1590: maria, simply fuck off for now..ok?