Tom Hanks as Robert Langdon?..absurd...
the da vinci code is gonna be out in the theaters sometime in 2006..when i found this out i was quite excited, since i had always thought that that book would make a great movie, possibly a better movie than the book. regardless, while reasearching further into this topic, i had stumbled upon something that completely outraged me....out of all people, Tom Hanks was cast as Robert Langdon!..what?!...if you are unaware (although im sure youre quite familiar, since the da vnci code is surprisngly popular with the adolescent masses) Langdon is a harvard symbologist who quickly finds himself uncovering a mystery and searching for clues to help save an ancient secret.. Langdon is a combination of Indiana Jones and the modern day Sherlock Holmes (thats a huge compliment for the book that wasnt even half as brilliantly written as Conan Doyles adventures)..aand though i still firmly believe that no living man can possibly portray the true essence of Sherlock Holmes, one can definitely act as Indiana Jones...therefore, the role is more for the young Harrison Ford type...i mean this guy is supposed to be sexy..Harrison Ford was sexy..true, it was almost situational sexy..as in..who wouldnt find your typical professor, suddenly placed in the middle of a jungle, searching for artifacts, with that hat, and a whip...ahh....HOT?...however, like i said..it was only almost situational, meaning it couldnt be just anyone....it had to be a smart, well built man, with appealing face features, and a charming personality...and you know all those other things that make a man sexy...my point (besides the fact that Harrison Ford was HOTTTT in that movie)..is for the character of Robert Langdon to be effective the same goal remains....and sadly Tom Hanks just cant pull of sexy....:( ..
on a final note, im in no way trying to critisize Hanks' acting talents..im just saying the guy has to look different. ..
on a final note, im in no way trying to critisize Hanks' acting talents..im just saying the guy has to look different. ..


9 Comments:
At 8:25 PM,
My Friend said…
No one can ever replace Indie, Hanks is just trying to put Harrison Ford completely in the shadow.
At 8:48 PM,
Kitas said…
Yeh.
At 2:38 PM,
My Friend said…
when isn't a whip fun you kinky bastards
At 7:44 PM,
Kitas said…
When it hurts? But I feel no pain...all pleasure.
At 4:59 PM,
Orange_Kiss said…
They should have casted Russell Crowe for the role. He is sexy and a good actor....Whip? Tsk tsk... How about those hand cuffs???
At 7:37 PM,
whatifyourfingerswerealive said…
yes..they did consider him for that role...and quite frankly im sure he would have fit in better...although i dont particularly find him sexy..
"what!? you dont think russell crowe is hot? what the hell is wrong with you?" -victor
At 6:59 PM,
whatifyourfingerswerealive said…
thank you, that is exactly why it would make a better movie....although i found that comment of yours almost offensive.. it made it sound like i thought the book was a fucking classic or something...and im damn near being insulted.
At 9:48 PM,
My Friend said…
Everyone I talked to was reading that shit but I never bothered, what the hell is it about anyways?
At 11:32 PM,
whatifyourfingerswerealive said…
"When an elderly curator of the Louvre is murdered inside the museum, Harvard symbologist Robert Langdon is called upon to decipher a strange symbol found near the body [and on the body, and in the paintings, and pagan symbols are all over the fucking place] . Joining him in his adventure through Paris and beyond is a talented French cryptologist, Sophie Neveu[she also happens to be the curators daughter]. Together, they discover a trail of clues hidden in the works of Da Vinci." The whole point is to save an ancient secret..
..angels and demons was a lot more interesting anyway..ended with two people having sex..with the implication that sex was a religous act...even enlightening..
Post a Comment
<< Home